An argument has been made, quite soundly, that an ethereal, gnostic impulse historically impels the development of groundbreaking information technologies. Two citations for this assertion spring immediately to mind: Erik Davis’ wonderful tome, Techgnosis (see the earlier ‘seed-crystal’ essay), and Avital Ronell’s The Telephone Book which details Alexander Graham Bell’s desire to speak with the dead.
Divination is always highly dependent upon context and focus. Any well-seasoned diviner will concede that the treasured systems and tools deployed/employed as method—time honored systems like the Tarot, iChing, and Astrology—are secondary to the ability to accurately articulate the question and one’s openness to receive the answer. Folk wisdom dictates, and books like Dr. Robert E. Svoboda’s Aghora trilogy agree, that once these prerequisites are met, one need only look—anywhere, at anything. The answer is right there. The real work is finding your way to that sweet spot.
To this end, a great deal of effort is often spent designing and creating the initial conditions, a conducive environment for divination and other magical work. This is standard fare: incense and altars and talismans and candles. They set the mood, if you will. But I posit that we can also back our way into this type of experience. I would cite the art installation, Haunt (which we blogged about here), although I doubt the firm would see this in the same light.
Another place which could inadvertently compel us towards a magical experience is known as the Uncanny Valley, a theory created by Japanese roboticist Masahiro Mori concerning the emotional response of humans to robots and other non-human entities wherein a creepiness is conveyed when something appears to be just a little bit too human. It’s usually negative, something computer animators take great pains to avoid. But the strangeness could be exploited, the uncanny valley as a gateway to the marvelous.
Several informative gems regarding this doorway (we could even dub it pathworking) are discussed today in the Writer Response Theory blog, like iGod, although I warn you, they are textbot gearheads, not fortune tellers. They look upon this zone as a fertile garden for their creative processes.
Just don’t forget, when your mind is focused and you are receptive, just gaze out your window and the answer is waiting for you. This is the essence of divination. With this knowledge, I think these “religious” chat bots could provide some interesting, and useful, context.
More details:
Interests: Practicing DJing, Feng Shui, Spirituality, Candle and Soap making, Yoga, Camping, Bicycling, Movies, Music
Inspiration: Music. Nature.
very interesting stuff
thanks
Is english your first language? You write as if it is not.
I have been reading the Lime blogs and I have noticed that “Beyond” is unique. It sometimes reads as if it were written by a pre-pubescent idiot savant, minus the savant. Other times, half the post is copied verbatim from another source and no quotes are used. This is always easy to spot as it's the only time anything coherent seems to appear. Most of the time it's so poorly written that I have to assume that English is not the author's native tongue. If this is the case, I am sorry for this, but I fear English may indeed be the authors native tounge
Edward Albee: “Good writers define reality; bad ones merely restate it. A good writer turns fact into truth; a bad writer will, more often than not, accomplish the opposite.”
Sarah, I work as the editorial assistant here at LIME, but I’d like to respond to this outside of any professional capacity (to the extent that it’s possible, of course).
I noticed your anonymous post the other day with the question of the native language of the writer and wrestled with figuring out both its meaning and its relevancy. Finding none of either, I shrugged it off. Now, though, you complain with a bit more coherency. A bit.
Firstly, I just want to say that I do thoroughly enjoy reading the Beyond category. Don’t tell the other writer/editors, but it’s among my top six favorite categories we cover here at LIME.
I’m sorry that you find the language to be difficult to follow or the posts to be “poorly written.” Frankly, I have no idea what the issue is. I find the writing to be perfectly clear and understandable. Spiros explores areas that I wouldn’t otherwise necessarily think about in a given day and he does so in a way that I find both provocative and easy to read. As I said, professional interests beside, I’m a fan. And I know many people who feel the same way. I’m sorry that you do not.
Finally, I believe that every time another source is used in this space it is made perfectly clear exactly what is going on. I personally apologize if this is not the case, and please accept my promise to try to make it more so in the future.
“tounge”= tongue
greek to me