PrintEmail
Comment
Corn-Based Plastic: Ahead of Its Time
Posted by Hillary Rosner on June 5, 2006 - 2:39pm.
files/images/prod/1519/742294816426ce9686336d.jpg

We've written before about biodegradable plastics, such as the corn-based containers used at eco-minded stores like Wild Oats. The containers are a great idea in theory, and could one day revolutionize the fast-food industry. But for the moment, the containers can pose a problem. They're not recyclable, even though they look like traditional plastic. But they don't decompose in standard backyard composts, because they need a higher temperature to fully degrade. Yet there's no collection method set up for them in most places, so the alternative is often to simply throw them in the trash - meaning they're sent to landfills, where biodegradable is meaningless.

The New Zealand Herald has an interesting story on the topic today, after a British company launched a corn-based water bottle. One recycling expert told the paper the bottles could "contaminate" the recycling process, because there's no system in place for sorting them from regular plastics.

Here in the U.S., we generate 210 million tons of trash each year. Contrary to what many people think, if we throw away something that's biodegradable, it's not going to degrade if it ends up in a landfill. Landfills are low-oxygen environments, designed this way on purpose so that waste doesn't seep into surrounding soil. But without oxygen, microorganisms can't do their biodegrading thing. So corn-based plastics will last nearly as long in the landfill as their non-biodegradable traditional plastic cousins.

Some cities are starting municipal composting programs, which send the compostable materials to an industrial facility that operates at a much higher temperature than your traditional backyard pile. There, corn-based plastics can quickly and happily degrade.

Image credit: AgriMarketing



Related Shop Items


<em>lobelia2001</em>'s picture
not only that...
by lobelia2001 on June 6, 2006 - 8:03am
...another question that needs to be asked here re: corn-based plastics, is whether the corn is genetically modified or not. Biodegradable plastic is great, but if it comes at the price of non-GMO fields possibly being tainted by pollen from GMO crops, it gets harder to justify expending the energy to create it. It might be preferable to just eliminate petroleum plastics outright rather than augment them with 'alternatives'. Because augmenting doesn't address the problem of petroleum plastic consumerism in the first place, it just sells people on additional products to purchase.
<em>phiggs</em>'s picture
great idea
by phiggs on June 6, 2006 - 10:53am
The idea of replacing rather than augmenting sounds smart -- though it does lead to more questions, like how much fossil fuel are we using to create these biodegradable products? And even if we move to biofuels to run the harvesting and processing equipment for feedstocks, food vs fuel issues pop up... Frustrating. Incidentally, Whole Foods markets still uses plastic utensils and containers for their take-out food -- their policy is not to go biodegradable until there's a non-GMO option.
<em>Paul_Freibott</em>'s picture
Big Up to San Francisco!
by Paul_Freibott on June 6, 2006 - 2:17pm
Thanks for the link/shout out to an article on Sunset Scavenger in San Francisco. As I've commented before, I love my garbage collectors! They have a fantastic recycling/composting program. Trader Joe's uses a lot of those biodegradable corn-based plastic containers (for fresh produce, curiously enough), and I toss mine into our green bin, which is whisked away to an industrial composting facility. Hopefully, more cities will follow suit.

User login


Join Lime Now, it's free