PrintEmail
Comment
The Dubious Debate About Global Warming
Posted by Philip Higgs on May 23, 2006 - 9:00am.
files/images/prod/1467/globalwarming5.gif

Perhaps you've seen the Competitive Enterprise Institute's global-warming-agnostic ads. You know, the ones that feature smiling children and happy flowers and the tagline "Carbon Dioxide: They call it pollution. We call it life." (Of course! Carbon dioxide = life! That's why, when you put a plastic bag over your head, you live!) Well, if you haven't seen the spots, hurry up and check them out before the CEI wises up to their unintentional comedy and pulls them.

Not only are the ads a textbook example of thin thinking and shoddy logic, they also - gasp! - misrepresent scientific research to make their pro-emission case.

Hoping to keep the myth of climate-change controversy alive, one ad, entitled "Glaciers," cites a couple of scientific papers allegedly finding that "Greenland's glaciers are growing, not melting" and "the Antarctic ice sheet is getting thicker, not thinner." Scientists! Controversy! The Debate Continues!

Except that one of those papers' lead authors is calling it B.S. In a press release, Curt Davis, an author of the cited Antarctic study, said, "These television ads are a deliberate effort to confuse and mislead the public about the global warming debate. They are selectively using only parts of my previous research to support their claims. They are not telling the entire story to the public." (Davis is an engineering professor and the director of the Center for Geospatial Intelligence at the University of Missouri-Columbia.) An industry-supported think tank misleading the public? Say it isn't so!

It is so. For more evidence, we turn to the Washington Post's Sebastian Mallaby, who came up with this little counter to the ad's Greenland claim:

"[T]he most authoritative and up-to-date statement on climate science is contained in a new report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change that is circulating in draft form. According to scientists who have seen it, Chapter Four says: 'Taken together, the ice sheets in Greenland and Antarctica are shrinking.' As to the possibility that the melting of some ice caps is offset by the growth of others, the draft also says: 'Thickening in central regions of Greenland is more than offset by increased melting near the coast.'"

[Photo credit: National Oceaninc & Atmospheric Administration]

[And mad props to this poster at RealClimate for the plastic bag joke.]



Related Shop Items


<em>Marie</em>'s picture
TOO FUNNY!!`
by Marie on May 23, 2006 - 9:50am
I had to forward this link to these videos to all my family & friends!! "Carbon Monoxide: They call it pollution, we call it life." ...are they serious?!! Then why do we put detectors in our houses/apt. to alert us of leaks, if it's GOOD for us? hahaha... I still haven't stopped laughing. Thanks for sharing this!!
<em>Anonymous</em>'s picture
Yes!
by Anonymous on May 23, 2006 - 11:07am
I LOVE the plastic bag analogy. That is perfect. Carbon dioxide: twice as good as Carbon monoxide!
<em>Anonymous</em>'s picture
Scarey and Sad
by Anonymous on May 23, 2006 - 11:22am
What is scarey and sad is that there are a lot of people out there who may be swayed by these ads. Any of us who are at all educated and concerned can laugh at how absurd the claims; unfortunately there are a lot who will only hear the (false) message that those who wish to limit pollution also want to take away all the power sources and revert to pre automation and technology.

We need to make sure an equally appealing and powerful message is out there that there are cleaner alternatives and healthier choices that can be made without significant negative impact to lifestyle. Those whose scientific work is being abused and removed from context need to speak up loud and clear, we need to support them in demanding public corrections and apologies.

<em>Anonymous</em>'s picture
I saw the commercial
by Anonymous on May 23, 2006 - 12:34pm
I saw the commercial and it encouraged me to give the global warming issue another thught. I guess carbon dioxide is all around us and the middle of the ice caps are getting thicker to make up for the melting thin edges.
<em>phiggs</em>'s picture
then you should reread the post
by phiggs on May 23, 2006 - 1:07pm
The reason the Antarctic ice sheet is getting thicker is because of increased precipitation in that area -- increased precipitation that is due to global warming. Regardless, the added ice is not nearly enough to "make up for" the overall loss. Which is what the IPCC report, referenced in the last paragraph above, makes clear.
<em>Anonymous</em>'s picture
CO2
by Anonymous on May 24, 2006 - 1:55pm
Right now, there is less CO2 in the atmosphere, not more. This is a fact that is due to the NeoCONS out there, shutting up like Rove & Mehlman tell them to, so they won't get subpoenaed by Fitzgerald or Spitzer. Thanks to the CONS listening to their gurus, there is so much less hot air and gas out there now, that breathing's almost a pleasure again.

User login


Join Lime Now, it's free

Meet New People

AutumnElayne (View Profile)

Interests: Indie Crafting, Art, Astronomy, Physics, History, Eco-Friendly, Computer Graphics, Sewing, Knitting, Drawing, Macrame, Painting, Spinning,Book Binding, Screenprinting, Electronics Tinkering, Web Design, Books about my interests, Coffee, Travel, Black Tea, Cooking, Corduroy, Wool Felt, Ribbons, Vintage Patches, Collecting Sanrio paraphernalia, Boondoggle, Zines
Inspiration: Carl Sagan, Jim Henson, and Tori Amos.

More new members | Create your profile