PrintEmail
Comment
Where is Your Soap Ending Up?
Posted by Hillary Rosner on May 11, 2006 - 8:23am.
files/images/prod/1415/710996_sk_md.jpg

Antibacterial soaps have been growing in popularity, and I can't remember the last time I went into a home with children where there wasn't a bottle of the stuff on every sink. I'm always reluctant to use it, fueled by a strange gut feeling that I'm better off learning to cope with the bacteria that surround me. Now there's some scientific back-up for my anti-antibacterial sentiments: new research found that as much as 75 percent of the chemicals used to make these products are emerging unharmed from sewage treatment plants, ending up in water supplies and subsequently used to irrigate farmland.

The research, from Johns Hopkins University and reported in the journal Environmental Science and Technology, found that 200 tons of two antibacterial compounds is ending up on agricultural land every year, mainly through the application of sludge onto fields. Two-thirds of the solid waste generated at water treatment plants around the country ends up on farmland, according to an article in the Los Angeles Times. The paper also reported that 1500 new products containing these substances - triclocarban and triclosan - have arrived on the scene since 2000.

The main problem with these compounds ending up in crops and soils is that they could kill beneficial microbes or create super-resistant bacteria or so-called superbugs. Triclosan can also react with chlorine in water to form cancer-causing compounds. There's no evidence yet of any actual harm done by the presence of these chemicals on farmland. No government agency is monitoring the presence of the substances in water or food.



Related Shop Items


<em>peabody</em>'s picture
Think about it for a second...
by peabody on May 11, 2006 - 8:15am
This research is completely valid. Much like antibiotics that are now becoming obsolete, these antibacterial disinfecting detergents are metaphorically painting ourselves into a corner. Over indulgence with these profolactics will be detrimental to our very well being. In time these microbes and bacteria will become resistant and stronger, leaving us with less choices or resources for combat. It is a fact that the hardest bacteria to kill are found in a hospital, imagine if everyone's home is hospital like. It will breed super bacteria and viruses (which are at a greater chance to mutate and re-develop then bacteria) every where leaving any means of salvation either unattainable or reserved for the extremely rich. I am cautious with the use of anti-microbial products. I am more prone to rinsing my hands with water rather than insisting on using a anti-body soap. I've been a very healthy person (very few colds) and it is my belief that living with a certain amount of dirt keeps you healthy, after all the addage goes "What doesn't kill you makes you stronger."

User login


Join Lime Now, it's free