PrintEmail
Comment
A Safer Canned Tuna
Posted by Jessica Harlan on August 2, 2006 - 6:08am.
tuna

When I learned that I couldn't eat sushi when I became pregnant, I was crushed. My husband and I got take-out from our corner sushi joint at least twice a week; how would I survive nine months without spicy tuna maki and yellowtail hand rolls?

Plus, I'd read about how the Omega-3 fatty acids in fish can help during pregnancy with the development of my baby's brain and nervous tissues. Not wanting my progeny to be a dullard (or insensitive, for that matter), I figured I was in store for a lot of tuna-salad sandwiches.

But not so fast. As most pregnant women have learned, there are hidden dangers for many of the other fish in the sea. Canned and fresh tuna, which are often packed from large, older fish, often contain dangerously high levels of mercury and other pollutants. Mercury, which accumulates in streams and oceans from industrial pollution, turns into the neurotoxin methylmercury, which builds up in fish and shellfish as they feed, and in turn can also accumulate in our own bloodstreams. What's scary is that it can take up to a year to leave our bloodstreams, and exposure to high levels of mercury can damage our brains and kidneys, not to mention developing fetuses.

Canned albacore tuna has a mean mercury level of 0.353 parts per million, according to the Food and Drug Administration. The FDA's recommendation is that pregnant women (as well as nursing mothers and young children) should only eat up to 6 ounces of albacore tuna per week. Canned light tuna, at 0.118 parts per million of mercury, is a little safer.

Luckily, my lunch box (and unborn child) no longer have to suffer tuna deprivation. Earlier this year, Wild Planet introduced Minimal Mercury Canned Wild Albacore, which, with 0.129 parts per million, has among the lowest mercury levels in the industry. The company packs only troll-caught fish that are three to five years old and weigh about 9 to 12 pounds. Because these fish are younger, they haven't had time to build up high levels of mercury in their flesh.

An added bonus to those who, like myself, are concerned with boosting baby's I.Q. in utero with plenty of Omega-3s, Wild Planet's tuna has 5.3 grams of Omega-3 oils per can, as compared to 0.9 grams in most national brands. Wild Planet packs its tuna raw, so that the oils and juices remain in the can when it's heat-sealed, unlike other canneries that pre-cook their fish, resulting in lost nutrients.

So now pregnant women and young children can enjoy tuna salad, tuna melts and other canned-tuna concoctions without worrying too much about scary toxins like mercury.

Now if only someone would work on making pregnancy-safe sushi.

Wild Planet Minimal Mercury Wild Albacore Tuna

Cost: 6 ounces for $4.99 to $5.99

Where to Buy: Independent health food stores, or online



Related Shop Items


<em>Anonymous</em>'s picture
would love to try it
by Anonymous on August 2, 2006 - 9:55am
this seems like a great alternative for special situations/occasions but a bit pricey for everyday tuna use.
<em>Anonymous</em>'s picture
What about the can?
by Anonymous on August 2, 2006 - 10:14am
Are they recyclable?
<em>Anonymous</em>'s picture
better price at Amazon.com
by Anonymous on August 2, 2006 - 10:45am
3.75 a can (6 pack)
<em>Anonymous</em>'s picture
yes...?
by Anonymous on August 2, 2006 - 10:48am
Aren't they aluminum? that's recyclable
<em>Anonymous</em>'s picture
The Can?
by Anonymous on August 2, 2006 - 10:56am
It is a metal can, of course it it recyclable.
<em>Anonymous</em>'s picture
Great News
by Anonymous on August 2, 2006 - 11:15am
Thank you for this article.
<em>Anonymous</em>'s picture
Don't despair on sushi...
by Anonymous on August 2, 2006 - 11:48am
When I was pregnant with my first, I didn't forgo sushi all together. I limited my choices to cooked and vegetable sushi. I had a lot of california rolls, ebi nigiri (cooked shrimp), saba (cooked mackerel), kampyo-maki (sweetened gourd roll) and so on. Ask the waiter or waitress next time you get sushi, which are cooked and therefore safe for pregnant women to eat.
<em>Anonymous</em>'s picture
Math?
by Anonymous on August 2, 2006 - 3:30pm
Er, isn't canned light tuna, at 0.118 parts per million, still safer than this albacore at 0.129 parts per million?
<em>JessicaHarlan</em>'s picture
Light vs. Albacore
by JessicaHarlan on August 2, 2006 - 3:39pm
Yes, the commercial light tuna is still slightly lower in mercury than the Wild Planet Albacore. But many people--myself included--prefer the milder flavor and the firmer texture of albacore tuna.
<em>Anonymous</em>'s picture
Accuracy of Hg Content
by Anonymous on August 3, 2006 - 12:28am
the recent findings are that the amount of Hg in the fish is much higher than previously thought, so if Wild Planet actually tests it's fish, then, you know the amount, instead of the supposed amount in commercial, irregularly tested canned light tuna.
<em>adamh</em>'s picture
Nice article. Thank you for
by adamh on October 5, 2009 - 4:17am
Nice article. Thank you for posting it. In association with this, I’ve read an article with regards to canned tuna and the truth is that, there are some canned tuna, which contains high level of mercury, which is not good for pregnant women because several studies have demonstrated a subtle loss of mental acuity in the offspring of women who consume fish during pregnancy. Fortunately, there is a tuna that really suitable for the pregnant women. Anyway, Has anyone heard of the pregnant woman pregnant again?  It sounds far fetched – but it's possible.  Julia Grovenburg has been confirmed as being the pregnant woman pregnant again – and it isn't twins. Doctors noticed a second fetal sac and heartbeat during an ultrasound, and checked it out.  The process is called superfetation, where a woman has a second menstrual cycle after beginning pregnancy, and the second ovum is fertilized.  There are only 10 confirmed cases, and the babies will be born a few weeks apart.  The pregnant woman pregnant again will now experience the joy of childbirth twice in a month's time, and need twice the payday loans to cover the hospital costs. Read more at nt-again/...
<em>adamh</em>'s picture
Nice article. Thank you for
by adamh on October 5, 2009 - 4:22am
Nice article. Thank you for posting it. In association with this, I’ve read an article with regards to canned tuna and the truth is that, there are some canned tuna, which contains high level of mercury, which is not good for pregnant women because several studies have demonstrated a subtle loss of mental acuity in the offspring of women who consume fish during pregnancy. Fortunately, there's a tuna that is suitable for the pregnant women. Anyway, Has anyone heard of the pregnant woman pregnant again?  It sounds far fetched – but it's possible.  Julia Grovenburg has been confirmed as being the pregnant woman pregnant again – and it isn't twins. Doctors noticed a second fetal sac and heartbeat during an ultrasound, and checked it out.  The process is called superfetation, where a woman has a second menstrual cycle after beginning pregnancy, and the second ovum is fertilized.  There are only 10 confirmed cases, and the babies will be born a few weeks apart.  The pregnant woman pregnant again will now experience the joy of childbirth twice in a month's time, and need twice the payday loans to cover the hospital costs. Read more at nt-again/...

User login


Join Lime Now, it's free