PrintEmail
Comment
The Renewable Energy Catch
Posted by Su Avasthi on August 3, 2007 - 12:35am.

A few years back, my local utilities company invested in an expensive wind power project in New Mexico.

Anyone who supports renewable or alternative energy has the option to sign up for wind power (or at least a portion of it) and pay a few extra dollars per month to help offset the cost of the project.

I signed up, and I've been proud to display a "Wind Power" bumper sticker on my car to let the world know that I think it's a worthwhile cause. (Yes, I see the irony of slapping these stickers on a fossil-fuel-using car, but that's the way it is.)

Anyway, I was -- and still am -- glad to do something that lessens our reliance on fossil fuels, and have no problem spending a few bucks to make alternative power more of a reality.

So I was dismayed when I read this article on LiveScience.com about a new study that's found that renewable energy may not be as green as we might like to believe.

According to the study, many of our most common renewable energy alternatives -- including wind farms, biomass, damming rivers, solar power -- would disrupt nature and existing ecosystems in profound and destructive ways.

The study found that:

  • Producing enough electricity to meet the U.S. demand would require a wind farm the size of Texas.
  • Powering New York via wind energy would require wind farm the size of Connecticut.
  • Solar power and biomass are "un-green" because the amount of land required would to make any gains would ultimately do more harm to the environment.

Fortunately, these findings were disputed by other scientists and environmentalists who don't buy into the study's "energy density" scenario. They argue that calculating energy density may not be the most reliable way to assess whether renewable resources are effective.

More importantly, while reading the article, I couldn't help but notice that the study seemed to have a slant towards using nuclear power. In fact, the lead researcher stated that nuclear power is more environmentally responsible than renewable resources.

Personally, I see the reasons to support -- as well as to resist -- nuclear power. But I'm not ready to give up on renewable power alternatives yet.

And, until I'm convinced otherwise, my "Wind Power" sticker is staying on my car.



<em>Statuesqueone</em>'s picture
Just use less
by Statuesqueone on August 3, 2007 - 2:17pm
This researcher may and may not be right, who's to say for sure until we get there. I'm all for renewable energy and I think we should do everything possible to make it happen. I also think we need to use less energy period. Do I really need to sit here in my air conditioned office (I don't control the settings and don't understand why we need AC in San Diego with an outside temp of 74 degrees F) with my space heater on? I can stand to be a bit uncomfortable for the sake of our planet Earth. It would make a huge difference if we all used less everyday.
<em>taradawn</em>'s picture
Studies
by taradawn on August 3, 2007 - 2:40pm
I've heard other similar things to this... they say the solar panels in great amounts would absorb the heat from the sun and enhance the greenhouse effect, but who is to say we have to resort to ONLY that kind of energy? I think putting solar plants here and there would do nothing considerably harmful to the environment, nor would wind farms. I'm not sure what my stance is on nuclear energy, but it has to be greener than the stuff we're running today! :) I'm with statuesqueone, though, perhaps we should just conserve more energy (coming from a gal who spends the majority of her time online... heh. I need to get out more!). I think one of the biggest problems with these "studies" is that everybody puts them in an all or nothing context. And whereas we'd all like to see only green and renewable power being used, we have to remeber to take baby steps!
<em>2renu</em>'s picture
Going Green without going Broke
by 2renu on August 3, 2007 - 6:54pm

I agree in part, but we can agree to disagree. I believe in "the power of one". One individual tells another and he tells another and so on. Hey guys, that is how great movements had their origins. I maybe a little older than some of you, but the changing of hearts and minds all started as ideas and then shared with like minds.
Everyone can play a role in this problem by doing something.  Solar energy is the most abundant natural resource we have, and that technology has been around for awhile, but it wasn't practical from a financial perspective until now.

 

There is a solution! I recently learned of a company that has figured out how to get Clean, Safe, Affordable Solar Power to the masses, and they do it without requiring any significant investment on the part of the homeowner. This company is helping homeowners switch to solar the easy way through a rental agreement. The customer gets a worry free solar system custom designed for 100% of their current consumption of electricity & an electric rate that is frozen at today's rate for up to 25 years. Being critical and pointing out what we are not doing is one thing, but we can make a Difference. Let’s do something, we can be part of the solution and not be part of the problem. This program is an easy way that you can have an impact on the environment and our pocket book.

   Imagine every home producing their own electric Solar power on their roofs without going broke. Now the average homeowner in America can take the power back and take action as a collective force with solar power. Think of it, all the energy savings that it would have all across this country not to include the money saved for the homeowner. http://www.solarforusa.com


<em>jeanewish</em>'s picture
Instead of big farms
by jeanewish on August 3, 2007 - 9:14pm
for wind or solar, why not have individual solar panels on our homes? Going independently green seems like a good idea to me, regardless of the integrity of that report. Wind farms and even solar farms would probably still be necessary, but on a lesser scale than if residential homes were individually powered when and where possible.
<em>melemmer</em>'s picture
Renewable Energy's Place
by melemmer on August 5, 2007 - 10:35am
I think it is possible to use renewable energy without taking over Texas or Connecticut.  Smaller wind farms could just be scattered across the country.  Solar panels can be put on roofs, so they won't take up any additional land.  Plus, we must realize that energy is not an all or nothing type of deal.  We shouldn't put all our eggs in one basket so to speak.  We shouldn't just rely on wind to power our country, just as we shouldn't rely solely on fossil fuels.  Having diverse sources of energy in the US will just increase our energy independence and our energy reliability.
<em>dcdaisy</em>'s picture
current demands?
by dcdaisy on August 5, 2007 - 7:54pm
It also seems a bit wrong-headed for the study to evaluate how alternative energy is insufficient to fed our current energy gluttony. We have to manage and control our energy demands before we can reasonably expect any source to meet it.
<em>Ecobabe</em>'s picture
Where's solar power?
by Ecobabe on August 5, 2007 - 10:05pm
Solar power has been an option for many decades and the technology has improved drastically. Unfortunately I think it is still somewhat expensive, what can be done about that? I agree with melemmer, we all should have solar panels on our roofs even if we live in an apartment complex. Even commercial buildings can install solar panels, and probably save the businesses money on heating and hot water. Roofs are every where and are perfect for solar panels. 



User login


Join Lime Now, it's free

Meet New People

AutumnElayne (View Profile)

Interests: Indie Crafting, Art, Astronomy, Physics, History, Eco-Friendly, Computer Graphics, Sewing, Knitting, Drawing, Macrame, Painting, Spinning,Book Binding, Screenprinting, Electronics Tinkering, Web Design, Books about my interests, Coffee, Travel, Black Tea, Cooking, Corduroy, Wool Felt, Ribbons, Vintage Patches, Collecting Sanrio paraphernalia, Boondoggle, Zines
Inspiration: Carl Sagan, Jim Henson, and Tori Amos.

More new members | Create your profile